Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:63-68
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Major, H.
Right arrow Articles by Heit, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Major, H.
Right arrow Articles by Heit, M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Urethral Sphincter Morphology in Women With Detrusor Instability

Heather Major, MD, Patrick Culligan, MD and Michael Heit, MD, MSPH

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville Health Sciences Center, Louisville, Kentucky.

Address reprint requests to: Michael Heit, MD, MSPH, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville Health Sciences Center, M-18, 315 East Broadway, Suite 4002, Louisville, KY 40202; E-mail: mheit{at}louisville.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sonographic urethral sphincter morphology is different in patients with detrusor instability than in those with normal urodynamic testing.

METHODS: Patients from a population of women presenting for evaluation of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse underwent intraurethral ultrasonography before multichannel urodynamic testing. Maximal rhabdosphincter thickness, total urethral diameter, total urethral circumference, and longitudinal smooth muscle thickness, diameter, and circumference were measured. For patients with detrusor instability, the strength of the involuntary detrusor contraction and the bladder volume at its onset were recorded. These data were compared with information from history questionnaires and urodynamic evaluations.

RESULTS: The 17 patients with detrusor instability and 16 patients with normal urodynamic testing did not differ with respect to age, vaginal parity, race, weight, body mass index, prior continence surgery, or maximal total urethral closure pressure. Patients with detrusor instability, had decreased urethral longitudinal smooth muscle thickness (3.0 ± 0.9 mm vs 4.1 ± 0.7 mm, P = .001), total urethral diameter (18.0 ± 1.6 mm vs 19.4 ± 1.4 mm, P = .01), and total urethral circumference (5.65 ± 0.5 cm vs 6.1 ± 0.4 cm, P = .012) compared with those with normal urodynamic tests. A linear relationship between rhabdosphincter thickness and strength of involuntary detrusor contraction was observed (r = .686, P = .002).

CONCLUSION: Urethral sphincter morphology is different in patients with detrusor instability compared with those who have normal urodynamic tests. These findings provide an anatomic basis for the physiologic findings in patients with "urethrogenic" detrusor instability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.S. Bagratee, V. Khullar, L. Regan, J. Moodley, and H. Kagoro
A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 266 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.