|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Address reprint requests to: David G. Mutch, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4911 Barnes Hospital Plaza, Box 8064, St. Louis, MO 63110; E-mail: mutchd{at}msnotes.wustl.edu.
OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors that may be used to predict an aggressive disease course and poor outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors).
METHODS: Data on 126 patients with ovarian borderline tumors were analyzed with regard to demographic characteristics, staging, presence of microinvasion, duration of follow-up, recurrence rate, rate of recurrence as invasive disease, mortality rate, preoperative and postoperative CA-125, and treatment. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate proportions for statistical significance. Disease-free and overall survival was calculated by using the KaplanMeier method and log-rank test.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 39.0 months (mean 47.8 months). Seven patients (5.6%) had recurrent disease. Advanced stage disease and microinvasion were associated with significantly higher recurrence and mortality rates than were stage I/II disease and borderline tumors without microinvasion, respectively. Two of 13 (15%, 95% CI 8.7, 21.3) patients with microinvasion died of recurrent invasive cancer, whereas only 1 out of 113 patients without microinvasion died of recurrent borderline tumor (OR 20.4, 95% CI 1.2, 239). All 3 patients with an aggressive disease course and poor outcome had increasing CA 125 levels at the time of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Certain patients with microinvasion may be at higher risk for recurrence as invasive disease and may require different treatment strategies. CA 125 monitoring may have a role in early detection of recurrence in patients with aggressive disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. G. Rao, E. Skinner, P. A. Gehrig, L. R. Duska, R. L. Coleman, and J. O. Schorge Surgical Staging of Ovarian Low Malignant Potential Tumors Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2004; 104(2): 261 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Green Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, August 6, 2003; 95(15): 1169 - 1169. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Morice, S. Camatte, A. Rey, D. Atallah, C. Lhomme, P. Pautier, C. Pomel, J.-F. Cote, C. Haie-Meder, P. Duvillard, et al. Prognostic factors for patients with advanced stage serous borderline tumours of the ovary Ann. Onc., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 592 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |