Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001;97:836-837
© 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Faught, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badr, A.
Right arrow Articles by Faught, W.

CASE REPORTS

UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION IN AN UNDIAGNOSED UTERINE SARCOMA

Ahmed Al-Badr, MBBS and Wylam Faught, MD, FRCSC

From the Division Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Ob/Gyn, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Address reprint requests to: Ahmed Al-Badr, MBBS 18 Rhapsody Lane Ottawa, Ontario K1V 1B1 Canada E-mail: ahmed{at}albadr.com

Abstract

Background: Uterine sarcomas are rare malignancies that resemble benign uterine leiomyomata. Uterine artery embolization is offered increasingly for treatment of uterine leiomyomata, which might lead to embolization of undiagnosed uterine sarcoma.

Case: A 52-year-old woman, gravida 7, para 6, with perimenopausal menometrorrhagia was diagnosed with uterine leiomyomata after physical examination and transvaginal ultrasound. An endometrial biopsy was negative for malignancy. After medical treatment was unsuccessful, she had uterine artery embolization. She then passed a piece of tissue from her vagina, the pathology report of which was necrotic high-grade sarcoma. During surgery we confirmed that the tumor was confined to the uterus.

Conclusion: Uterine sarcoma cannot be diagnosed except by pathologic examination of a resected specimen. Women considering uterine artery embolization for treatment of apparent leiomyomata should be counseled on the risk of decreased survival by delaying diagnosis and treatment of uterine sarcoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
A N Keeling and J F Reidy
Imaging and treatment of uterine fibroids, including the role of uterine artery embolization
Imaging, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 374 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
V. N Harry, G. V Narayansingh, and D. E Parkin
Uterine leiomyosarcomas: a review of the diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2007; 9(2): 88 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J L Hughes and J F Reidy
Imaging and treatment of uterine fibroids including the role of uterine artery embolisation
Imaging, June 1, 2003; 15(2): 79 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.