Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96:33-37
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRESLEY, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by CATALANO, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PRESLEY, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by CATALANO, P. M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Anthropometric Estimation of Maternal Body Composition in Late Gestation

LARRAINE HUSTON PRESLEY, MS, WILLIAM W. WONG, PhD, NOREEN M. ROMAN, MBA, SAEID B. AMINI, PhD, MBA, JD and PATRICK M. CATALANO, MD

From the Department of Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

Address reprint requests to: Patrick M. Catalano, MD, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Department of Reproductive Biology, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, E-mail: pcatalano{at}metrohealth.org

Objective: To construct a model to estimate maternal body composition in late gestation using anthropometric measurements.

Methods: Twenty healthy pregnant women at 30 weeks’ gestation had estimates of body composition using hydro-densitometry, with corrections for residual lung volume, and total body water using 18O (development group). Total H2 body water was estimated from 18O abundances measured by gas-isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Maternal age, height, weight, and seven skinfold sites were correlated with fat mass using stepwise regression analysis. The anthropometric model to estimate fat mass was then tested prospectively in a second group of 20 subjects and correlated with underwater weighing and total body water measurements (validation group). Statistical analysis used {chi}2, paired t and Wilcoxon sign-rank tests.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in maternal demographics between groups. The fat mass of development group subjects using underwater weighing and total body water was 22.7 ± 7.6 kg. Using the development group, a model was derived that explained 91% of the variance in fat mass by underwater weighing and total body water using maternal weight and triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac skinfolds (r2 = 0.91, P < .001). When tested prospectively in the validation group, the correlation remained statistically significant (r2 = 0.89, P < .001). There was no statistically significant (P = .88) difference between the anthropometric estimates of fat mass and underwater weighing and total body water measurements (95% confidence interval -2.476, 2.748 kg of fat mass).

Conclusion: This anthropometric model can be used to predict maternal fat mass in late gestation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
T Ueland, T Dalsoren, N Voldner, K Godang, T Henriksen, and J Bollerslev
Retinol-binding protein-4 is not strongly associated with insulin sensitivity in normal pregnancies.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 159(1): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.