Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;94:399-402
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SEUBERT, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by GONIK, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SEUBERT, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by GONIK, B.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Partner Notification of Sexually Transmitted Disease in an Obstetric and Gynecologic Setting

DAVID E. SEUBERT, MD, IAN M. THOMPSON, MS and BERNARD GONIK, MD

From the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Address reprint requests to: David E. Seubert, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Wayne State University School of Medicine, Hutzel Hospital 4707 St. Antoine Boulevard Detroit, MI 48083 E-mail: dseubert{at}med.wayne.edu

Objective: To survey obstetrician-gynecologists regarding current approaches to partner notification of women with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to relate reported practices to state requirements.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to community, hospital-employed, and university-based physicians within a single health care system. The survey was designed to assess physician demographics, knowledge, and attitudes about partner notification of women with STDs.

Results: One hundred eight (49%) of 222 surveys were returned. Respondents were 36% private practitioners, 38% hospital-employed, and 23% university faculty physicians. Although most correctly identified the importance of partner notification for several STDs, they (63 of 108, 58%, confidence interval [CI] 50%, 67%) could not identify all of those conditions. Most respondents (84 of 108, 78%, CI 69%, 85%) were unaware of all required reportable STDs and the state’s preferred method of partner notification. The vast majority of respondents (96 of 108, 89%, CI 82%, 94%) relied on women to notify their partners of the STD.

Conclusion: Educational efforts are needed to increase physician awareness of required reportable STDs and the role of partner notification and treatment in disease control. Physicians need to be aware of state regulations for partner notification when they are in practice. Development of standard algorithms for partner notification and treatment might be needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J Warszawski and L Meyer
Sex difference in partner notification: results from three population based surveys in France
Sex Transm Inf, February 1, 2002; 78(1): 45 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.