Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:648-652
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GAISER, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by GUTSCHE, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GAISER, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by GUTSCHE, B. B.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Obstetricians’ Ability to Assess the Airway

ROBERT R. GAISER, MD, EDWARD T. MCGONIGAL, MD, PATRICIA LITTS, MD, THEODORE G. CHEEK, MD and BRETT B. GUTSCHE, MD

From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Address reprint requests to: Robert R. Gaiser, MD Department of Anesthesiology Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 E-mail: gaiserr{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

Objectives: To assess the ability of obstetricians to recognize parturients at risk for difficult intubation and to examine the effect of education in airway examination on that ability.

Methods: The airways of 160 parturients were examined by four physicians: one attending and one resident obstetrician, and one attending and one resident anesthesiologist. After each airway examination, the physicians completed questionnaires about possible difficult intubation, use of antepartum consultation, and choice of analgesia early in labor.

Results: Instruction in airway examination did not affect obstetricians’ ability to assess airways. Compared with the attending anesthesiologist’s opinion, the sensitivity and specificity of the attending obstetrician before instruction were 0.59 and 0.82, respectively, and for the obstetric resident, 0.41 and 0.89, respectively. After instruction, the sensitivity and specificity for the obstetric attending physician were 0.60 and 0.83, respectively and for the obstetric resident, 0.50 and 0.87, respectively. In airways judged possible difficult intubations by the obstetricians, instruction did not affect the use of antepartum consultation or early epidural analgesia by the residents. In the obstetric attending physicians there was a significant increase in use of early epidural analgesia.

Conclusion: Although instruction in airway examination did not affect obstetricians’ ability to predict difficult airways, it did affect treatment of labor analgesia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.