Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1997;90:54-57
© 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boardman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boardman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, J

Articles

Endovaginal sonography for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection

LA Boardman, JF Peipert, JM Brody, AS Cooper, and J Sung

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical utility of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection. METHODS: Fifty-five women who either met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's minimal criteria for acute pelvic inflammatory disease or were being seen for non-classic signs of upper genital tract infection were evaluated. During abdominal and endovaginal ultrasound testing, fluid in the cul-de-sac, discrete tubes with or without tubal fluid, multicystic ovaries, and adnexal masses were noted. Upper genital tract infection was confirmed by laparoscopic visualization or histologic or microbiologic evidence of salpingitis of endometritis. RESULTS: The specificity of identifying fallopian tubes with or without intraluminal fluid on ultrasound was 97% (35 of 36); the sensitivity, however, was only 32% (six of 19). Calculated using Bayes theorem and based on a prevalence rate of 50%, the positive predictive value of visualizing fallopian tubes was 91%. The sensitivities associated with the visualization of a multicystic ovary or tubo-ovarian abscess were 42% (eight of 19) and 32% (six of 19), with specificities of 86% (31 of 36) and 97%, (35 of 36), and positive predictive values of 75% and 91%, respectively. Cul-de-sac fluid was associated with low sensitivity (37%; seven of 19), low specificity (58%; 21 of 36), and the lowest positive predictive value (47%). CONCLUSION: Endovaginal sonography has limited clinical utility in the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection due to its low sensitivity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Guerriero, S. Ajossa, M.P. Lai, V. Mais, A.M. Paoletti, and G.B. Melis
Transvaginal ultrasonography associated with colour Doppler energy in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1568 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. A. Tukeva, H. J. Aronen, P. T. Karjalainen, P. Molander, T. Paavonen, and J. Paavonen
MR Imaging in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Comparison with Laparoscopy and US
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.