Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1975;45:569-573
© 1975 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by MISHELL, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by MISHELL, D. R., JR.

Randomized Comparative Study of the Copper T 300, Dalkon Shield, and Shell Loop in Parous Women

DONNA L. COOPER, MD, MPH, ROBERT ISRAEL, MD, FACOG and DANIEL R. MISHELL, JR., MD, FACOG

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine and Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

A randomized comparative study of the Copper T 300, the standard Dalkon Shield® and the Silicone Shell Loop D was conducted on 776 parous women. Net cumulative first event rates at 1 year and at 18 months, calculated by life-table analysis, were as follows: Copper T 300—pregnancy 1.2/1.9, expulsion 6.4/7.0, removal for pain or bleeding 7.4/10.8; Dalkon Shield—pregnancy 2.7/4.5, expulsion 5.8/5.8, removal for pain or bleeding 7.7/14.7; Shell Loop—pregnancy 3.8/4.9, expulsion 0.5/0.5, removal for pain or bleeding 9.1/13.1. None of the differences in event rates, except the lower expulsion rate of the Shell Loop, were significant. The continuation rates for the three devices at both 12 and 18 months were similar, indicating that there was little difference in their performance. As the results of this study showed a similarity of the incidence of events among very differently designed IUD's, previously reported differences in performance of these and possibly other types of IUD's may very likely be more related to differences among clinics than to differences among the devices themselves.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.