Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1975;45:325-327
© 1975 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEINBERG, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by UNMAN, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WEINBERG, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by UNMAN, S. K.

Intraamniotic Urea for Induction of Midtrimester Pregnancy Termination

A Further Evaluation

PAUL C. WEINBERG, MD, FACOG., JOHN E. LINMAN, BS and SALLY K. UNMAN, BS

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Medical School at San Antonio. Texas

Abstract

Forty percent hypcrosmolar urea Milution was used iutraamniotically to induce midtrimester pregnancy termination in 508 patients. The mean injection-abortion interval was 43.4 hours in those patients aborting within 7 days (85.8% or the total group); 76% of the group aborted within 72 hours. Complications from the procedure included endometritis hemorrhage, and nausea and vomiting; 29.3%or the patients required operative completion of the abortion (placental removal 12 hours after passage of the fetus). There were no cases of hypernalremia, cardiac arrest or collapse, clinically evident coagulopathies, nor cervical lacerations. This study supports the conclusion that urea is a safer intraamniotic solution than hypertonic saline for midtrimester pregnancy termination







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.