HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Jönsson, E. R. Articles by Herbst, A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jönsson, E. R. Articles by Herbst, A. Related Collections General obstetrics

Modified Ritgen’s Maneuver for Anal Sphincter Injury at Delivery

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Eva Rubin Jönsson¹, Ibtesam Elfaghi, MD², Håkan Rydhström, MD, PhD^1,2 and Andreas Herbst, MD, PhD¹

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University Hospital, and Helsingborg Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Ritgen’s maneuver decreases the risk of third- to fourth-degree perineal tears compared with simple perineal support.

METHODS: A total of 1,623 nulliparous women in term labor, singleton pregnancy, and cephalic presentation were randomly assigned to Ritgen’s maneuver or standard care. Ritgen’s maneuver denotes extracting the fetal head, using one hand to pull the fetal chin from between the maternal anus and the coccyx, and the other on the fetal occiput to control speed of delivery. Ritgen’s maneuver was performed during a uterine contraction, rather than, as originally recommended, between contractions. Our standard care entailed perineal support with one hand and control of the speed of crowning with the other, and use of Ritgen’s maneuver only on specific indications. Women delivered by cesarean delivery (n=10) or instrumentally (n=142) were excluded, as well as 39 erroneously included women (parous or in preterm labor), six inaccurately assigned participants, one with missing data, and two participants who withdrew consent. For the remaining 1,423 women, the result was analyzed according to intention to treat.

RESULTS: Ritgen’s maneuver was performed in 554 (79.6%) of 696 women randomly assigned to this procedure and in 31 (4.3%) of 727 women randomly assigned to simple perineal support. The rate of third- to fourth-degree tears was 5.5% (n=38) in women assigned to Ritgen’s maneuver and 4.4% (n=32) in those assigned to simple perineal support (relative risk 1.24; 95% confidence interval 0.78–1.96).

CONCLUSION: Ritgen’s maneuver does not decrease the risk of anal sphincter injury at delivery, at least not when performed during a contraction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00652977

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. G. Cunningham The Ritgen Maneuver: Another Sacred Cow Questioned Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2008; 112(2): 210 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF]