Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:658-662
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by David, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chitty, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by David, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chitty, L. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genetics and teratology
Right arrow Prenatal Diagnosis

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Risk of Recurrence of Holoprosencephaly in Euploid Fetuses

Anna L. David, PhD, MRCOG1, Vatsala Gowda, MD1, Clare Turnbull, BMBCh, MRCP2 and Lyn S. Chitty, PhD, MRCOG1,2

From the 1Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson and Obstetric Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust; and 2Academic Department of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cause of and devise a management strategy for holoprosencephaly cases seen at a regional tertiary referral fetal medicine unit.

METHODS: Holoprosencephaly cases referred to University College London Hospital's Fetal Medicine Unit in the past 15 years were ascertained from a fetal database. We examined maternal, neonatal, genetic, and pathology records for prenatal and postnatal management, outcome, and genetic follow-up.

RESULTS: Forty-three women presented with a diagnosis of holoprosencephaly in one or more pregnancy. In one woman with a single affected pregnancy, there were incomplete data, and the postnatal diagnosis was not holoprosencephaly. For the remaining 41 women with complete outcome data, parental consent for fetal karyotyping was given in 36 women (88%) and was abnormal in 21 women (58%). Fifteen women had a euploid fetus or fetuses, of whom three women (20%, 95% confidence interval 4–48%) had a recurrence of holoprosencephaly. One woman had six affected pregnancies, the first diagnosed at 20 weeks of gestation and then at 12–14 weeks. The parental karyotypes were normal, but molecular analysis showed a mutation in the sonic hedgehog gene. In two women, holoprosencephaly was diagnosed at 27 weeks and birth, with a recurrence diagnosed at 22 and 24 weeks of gestation, respectively.

CONCLUSION: In this series there was a 20% recurrence risk for parents whose fetus had holoprosencephaly and a normal karyotype. Genetic review for parental examination, magnetic resonance imaging scanning, and mutation analysis is important in these cases. First-trimester ultrasound scanning is advised to detect recurrence early in gestation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.