Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:71-76
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amaru, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gaddipati, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amaru, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gaddipati, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy
Right arrow Pediatrics/neonatology
Right arrow Preterm labor
Right arrow Ultrasound/doppler

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Is Discordant Growth in Twins an Independent Risk Factor for Adverse Neonatal Outcome?

Rebecca C. Amaru, MD, Melissa C. Bush, MD, Richard L. Berkowitz, MD, Robert H. Lapinski, PhD and Sreedhar Gaddipati, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Address reprint requests to: Sreedhar Gaddipati, MD, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 622 West 168th Street, PH 16–66, New York, NY 10032; e-mail: sg2203{at}columbia.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether discordant growth is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in twins after adjusting for growth restriction.

METHODS: This was a retrospective, hospital-based cohort study of twin gestations with 2 live births delivered at 24 weeks or later from 1992 to 2001. Twin gestations were classified as small for gestational age (SGA) if one or both infants was less than the 10th percentile at birth by singleton Brenner norms and discordant if there was a 20% or more weight discordance.

RESULTS: Of 1,318 twin pairs, 856 were appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and concordant, 70 pairs were AGA and discordant, 254 pairs were SGA and concordant, and 138 pairs were SGA and discordant. The 4 groups had similar maternal demographics and medical comorbidity. When adjusting for chorionicity, antenatal steroid use, oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, and gestational age at delivery, discordant twins were more likely to have a cesarean delivery (odds ratio 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.22, 2.87) and to be associated with some adverse neonatal outcomes (low and very low birthweight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal oxygen requirement and hyperbilirubinemia) independent of SGA status. A statistically nonsignificant trend (odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 0.99, 6.01) toward higher rates of intraventricular hemorrhage was noted in discordant twins, and no difference was seen for ventilator requirement, respiratory distress syndrome, or necrotizing enterocolitis.

CONCLUSION: Discordance places twins at increased risk for some adverse perinatal outcomes, whether they are AGA or SGA. Discordance was not an independent risk factor for serious neonatal morbidity or mortality; however, this study was underpowered to detect those differences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
Y. Yinon, R. Mazkereth, N. Rosentzweig, A. Jarus-Hakak, E. Schiff, and M. J. Simchen
Growth Restriction as a Determinant of Outcome in Preterm Discordant Twins
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2005; 105(1): 80 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. Lutfi, V. M. Allen, J. Fahey, C. M. O'Connell, and M. J. Vincer
Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: A Population-Based Study
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1289 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2004; 9(5): e5 - e5.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.